HtmlToText
-- -- ↓ agroinnovations.com regenerative agriculture for community development home menu ↓ skip to primary content skip to secondary content about blog podcast contact post navigation ← older posts towards a democratically-distributed iot posted on june 3, 2015 by frank june 3, 2015 reply “ earlyrobot ” by jennifer – omnibot 2000 (1985) . licensed under cc by-sa 2.0 via wikimedia commons . the questions raised in my previous post are worth serious consideration. if the commanding heights of global industry are to be conquered by robots, then this is a step towards a distopian cyberfeudalism straight from the pages of science fiction. to the uninitiated, the vision of robot overlords may represent something with some resemblance to a human, like the terminator, or even the 1980’s toy the omnibot, complete with the computerized voice and choppy, robot movements. in reality, these robots are much more likely to look very similar to things we already see in our everyday environment: cars, tractors, pumps, electrical outlets, automatic fences, etc. the essential difference will be one of connectivity and control systems; cars and tractors, instead of acting as discrete units on the landscape, will be interconnected, receiving data from and sending data back to the server farms of the internet cloud. hardware interconnectivity will be mediated and controlled by software, which is the area of greatest development at the moment. development and deployment are the clear and present opportunity for the open source entrepreneur. google, facebook, amazon et al. (ie “the stacks”) want sole and exclusive access and control of the hardware, software, and data of the iot. and while they certainly have the capital and the clout to make that happen, the final outcome is hardly a fait accompli . nevertheless, i am left with numerous questions that, if answered, may provide some insight into the path forward for building a decentralized, p2p iot that is owned and operated in a more democratically distributed fashion: what are the elements of successful open source projects? how can these projects be funded in a business environment largely driven by venture capital and promises of multibillion dollar returns? how are these projects coordinated over large, disparate groups that all have a stake in its success, but may not be able to lead their development? what is the role of the worker-owned cooperative, or coalitions of such cooperatives, acting as decentralized groups of consultants developing and deploying systems in the real world? how do we bridge the gap between technologists and industry specialists (farmers, construction workers, doctors), such that developed technologies reflect and address the needs of realities on the ground? what real and immediate monetary incentives exist for technologists to develop and deploy these systems in conjunction with industry professionals? all of these questions point to a development pathway that is bumpy and unpredictable, but also full of opportunity and potential. if you have answers to any of these questions, or feel that you would like to see some more added to the list, please feel free to chime in on the comments thread. posted in economics , iot | tagged democracy , economics , iot , open-source | leave a reply iot and the future of open source posted on june 2, 2015 by frank june 2, 2015 1 photo courtesy lima pix the internet of things is here, in a fledgling state, but arriving with all the speed and disruption that the worldwide web and web 2.0 did in previous decades. with the internet of things, everyday objects are now connected to the global network, providing data on everything from ambient temperature in a domestic bedroom to the temperature of a nuclear reactor core in a utility-scale electrical power plant. the mckinsey global institute estimates a market size of $6.2 trillion by the year 2025. according to an article by the the siemens corporation, “the market research and consulting firm international data corporation (idc) estimates that 32 billion objects will be connected to the internet by 2020, and that these will produce ten percent of all the data generated worldwide”. of course this increased influx of data will be broken down along traditional industry lines: there will be an iot sector for residential construction, for agriculture, healthcare, and manufacturing. these systems will likely be a blend of proprietary and open source solutions, stacks of small embedded hardware, coupled with sensors and actuators, streaming data to the cloud for processing, storage, and analysis, then acting on that data through various control systems like heating and cooling, water pumps, and medical devices. in some cases these systems will greatly enhance efficiency and productivity, allowing for further mechanization and the greater integration of electromechanical devices (ie robotics) into industrial processes. in other cases these systems may add greater capital expenditure via deployment and maintenance costs accompanied by insignificant roi; these systems will fail. these are all things that will play out in the iot marketplace over the coming decade. there will be winners and losers. at first blush, open source software and hardware seems poised to be a big winner in the realm of iot. ubuntu is currently working on snappy core , “an app store for open robots.” and just recently google announced brillo , what they are calling the “underlying operating system for the internet of things”, which will be android-based and at least have some open source components. arduino microcontrollers and similar open embedded systems are going strong and continuing to grow in popularity, versatility, and diversity. is open source software and hardware on the verge of taking over the world? not so fast. for the mega-corporations bringing these products to market, open source may be a convenient development approach, and may have a familiar appeal after years of greenwashing faux environmental initiatives, but it bears no resemblance at all to richard stallman’s philosophical stance that “non-free software is a social problem and free software is the solution.” while open source flourishes on the cloud, in your android handset, and even in unexpected places like facebook and microsoft, the smartest of the proprietary mega-companies have long since realized that the true value lies in the data sets that end-users generate while interacting with the software. an example of such interaction with the software can be observed on the site http://betsson-casino.nl/ , which stores the data of the best online casinos. a large number of users on the internet choose betsson-casino for interesting content and unique bonuses of popular casinos. there is also a mobile version that is available from any android device. facebook and google are poster children for the new corporatizating of private data; but now as these data tracking systems move into the physical world, tractors are spying on farmers, sending back their data so that georeferenced industry-specific knowledge can be aggregated and analyzed, with the end-game being the complete robotization of the factory farm. the question remains: who will own the software and hardware systems as they are deployed into the world in the coming decades? clearly, however, it doesn’t just matter who owns the hardware-software, but ultimately and perhaps most importantly, who will own the reams and reams of data that will begin to flow as the internet colonizes the planet? posted in agriculture , iot | tagged agriculture , data , iot , open-source , osat | 1 reply photo tweets: the crops of peru and bolivia posted on may 3, 2015 by frank may 3, 2015 reply tarwi (lupinus mutabilis), being sold on the street in #cochabamba #bolivia . a highland crop. http://t.co/ebekkrqkyu pic.twitter.com/dj0ivxriae — agroinnovations (@agroinnovations) may 1, 2015 baked cuy (guinea pig) w/ papa muru huayro: tradi
Informations Whois
Whois est un protocole qui permet d'accéder aux informations d'enregistrement.Vous pouvez atteindre quand le site Web a été enregistré, quand il va expirer, quelles sont les coordonnées du site avec les informations suivantes. En un mot, il comprend ces informations;
Domain Name: AGROINNOVATIONS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 111238749_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2016-01-20T20:26:23Z
Creation Date: 2004-02-04T21:03:26Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2018-02-04T21:03:26Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: abuse@godaddy.com
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: B.NS.BUDDYNS.COM
Name Server: C.NS.BUDDYNS.COM
Name Server: D.NS.BUDDYNS.COM
Name Server: F.NS.BUDDYNS.COM
Name Server: NS2.AGROINNOVATIONS.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2017-08-20T11:14:12Z <<<
For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp
NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.
TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.
The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.
REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC
SERVERS
SERVER com.whois-servers.net
ARGS domain =agroinnovations.com
PORT 43
TYPE domain
RegrInfo
DOMAIN
NAME agroinnovations.com
CHANGED 2016-01-20
CREATED 2004-02-04
STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
NSERVER
B.NS.BUDDYNS.COM 108.61.224.67
C.NS.BUDDYNS.COM 88.198.106.11
D.NS.BUDDYNS.COM 107.191.99.111
F.NS.BUDDYNS.COM 103.6.87.125
NS2.AGROINNOVATIONS.COM 173.214.160.254
REGISTERED yes
Go to top